
2
SCHRAMM DE OLIVEIRA et al.
Canelones, San José, and Rivera— It is classified as
Data Deficient but considered a conservation priority
because of its limited range and signs of local
population declines (Etheridge & Williams, 1991;
Langone et al., 2000; Carreira et al., 2006; Canavero et
al., 2010; Abdala et al., 2012; Carreira & Estrades,
2013; Carreira & Maneyro, 2015). A previously cited
record from Montevideo was reassigned to Canelones
after verification of collection data (Carreira et al.,
2006). In Argentina, U. undulatus is known only from a
single locality in Punta Lara (Etheridge & Williams,
1991) and was excluded from national assessments
due to the absence of confirmed records for over a
century (Ávila et al., 2013). In Brazil, the species is
included within the National Action Plan for the
Conservation of Threatened Amphibians and Reptiles
of the Southern Region (Portaria nº 25, February
2012), underscoring the importance of updated
distributional data. After its original description in 1834
from São Lourenço do Sul (the type locality), U.
undulatus remained unrecorded in Brazil for over 179
years until it was rediscovered in 2013 in Cassino, both
in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Oliveira et al., 2022)
(Fig. 1). Although a subsequent record was mentioned
by Cei (1993), the specimen in question appears to
correspond to U. grilli, based on both morphological
features and its locality of origin. Additionally,
specimens attributed to U. undulatus deposited at
MZUSP lack collection date information, preventing
confirmation of any records between the original
description and the 2013 rediscovery.
Here, we report the third confirmed record of U.
undulatus in Brazil, further expanding its known
distribution. The field observation was made on 30
November 2024 at a site known as Cerro do Ubaldo
(−31.510295, −53.111799; Datum WGS84), in the
municipality of Piratini, state of Rio Grande do Sul,
approximately 10 km from the urban perimeter (Fig. 1).
The area lies at an elevation of 360 meters and is
characterized by granite outcrops and open grassland
with scattered shrubs, a vegetation formation typical of
the southern Brazilian highlands. This locality is
situated about 120 km northeast of the most recent
record from Cassino and roughly 100 km west of the
historical type locality in São Lourenço do Sul (Oliveira
et al., 2022). The individual was photographed and
released (Fig. 2). Our finding suggests the possible
existence of additional populations in the region,
although the species may remain undetected due to its
elusive behavior and habitat use. The observed color
pattern corresponds to the “iheringi” morphotype,
which is the expected pattern for Brazilian populations
(Cei, 1993; Carreira & Maneyro, 2013), supporting the
identification.
Additional field surveys are essential to clarify the
current distribution of U. undulatus in Brazil, especially
in areas with similar ecological conditions that may host
undetected populations. New occurrence records,
such as the one reported here, are fundamental for
advancing knowledge of this elusive and poorly
documented species, whose actual range is likely
underestimated due to its rarity and the scarcity of
records. Expanding available information is therefore a
priority, as limited data hinder accurate assessments
and effective conservation planning. For rare and little-
known species like U. undulatus, key components of
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature
Red List) assessments include geographic distribution
and potential threats. Documenting additional localities
not only refines the understanding of the species' range
but also helps identify priority areas for focused
ecological and conservation studies. We emphasize
the urgent need to implement targeted survey and
conservation programs aimed at locating and
monitoring existing populations. Such initiatives are
essential to bridge critical knowledge gaps and to
support informed strategies for the effective
management and protection of this species.
REFERENCES
Abdala, C.S., Acosta, J.L., Acosta, J.C., Álvarez, B.B.,
Arias, F., Avila, L.J., Blanco, M.G., Bonino, M.,
Boretto, J.M., Brancatelli, G., Breitman, M.F.,
Cabrera, M.R., Cairo, S., Corbalán, V., Hernando,
A., Ibargüengoytía, N.R., Kacorilis, F., Laspiur, A.,
Montero, R., … Zalba, S.M. (2012). Categorización
del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y
anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos
de Herpetología, 26(Suppl. 1), 215-248.
Achaval, F., & Olmos, A. (2003). Anfíbios y reptiles del
Uruguay (2.ª ed.). Graphis.
Avila, L.J., Martínez, L.E., & Morando, M. (2013).
Checklist of lizards and amphisbaenians of
Argentina: An update. Zootaxa, 3616(3), 201-38.
Cacciali, P., Carreira, S., Kacoliris, F., Montero, R., &
Pelegrin, N. (2021). Anisolepis undulatus. The
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021.
Canavero, A., Carreira, S., Langone, J.A., Achaval, F.,
Borteiro, C., Camargo, A., da Rosa, I., Estrades, A.,
Fallabrino, A., Kolenc, F., López-Mendilaharsu,
M.M., Maneyro, R., Meneghel, M., Núñez, D.,
Prigioni, C.M., & Ziegler, L. (2010). Conservation
status assessment of the amphibians and reptiles
of Uruguay. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 100(1), 5-12.
Carreira, S., & Estrades, A. (2013). Reptiles. En A.
Soutullo, C. Clavijo, & J. A. Martínez-Lanfranco
(Eds.), Especies prioritarias para la conservación
en Uruguay: Vertebrados, moluscos continentales
y p l a n t a s v a s c u l a r e s ( p p . 1 2 9 - 1 4 7 ) .
SNAP/DINAMA/MVOTMA y DICYT/MEC.
Carreira, S., & Maneyro, R. (2015). Lista roja de los
anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. DINAMA.
Cei, J.M. (1993). Reptiles del noroeste, nordeste y este
de la Argentina. Museo Regionale di Scienze
Bol. Soc. Zool. Uruguay (2ª época). 2026. ISSN 2393-6940Vol. 35(1): e35.1.1